سامانه مدیریت اسناد ( سبا ) بر روی تمام پایگاه ها فعال شد.
برای مدیریت الکترونیک مقالات ، پایان نامه ها، پروژه ها و سایر اسناد


خدمات سرقت ادبی یکتاوب  خدمات DOI کراس رف

به اطلاع می رساند با توجه به تغییر سامانه رتبه بندی نشریات در آینده، به روز رسانی اطلاعات آن از 97/12/1 انجام نشده است.


، جلد ۲۳، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۲۹-۱۳۶

عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله

عنوان انگلیسی Comparison of two Intranasal Sedatives, Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine, in Children with High Dental Fear: a Randomized Clinical Trial
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Statement of the Problem: Pharmacologic management of uncooperative behavior is a growing trend in dentistry. Determining the most appropriate drug, route of administration, and proper candidate for sedation have been the goal of several investigations. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the sedative effect of intranasal (IN) sedation of midazolam (MDZ) in compare to dexmedetomidine (DEX) while taking into consideration the effect of dental fear, and psychological status on sedation success. Materials and Method: This double-blind randomized clinical trial included 92 uncooperative dental patients aged 4-6. Study participants were randomly assigned to receive either 0.2mg/kg IN MDZ or 1µg/kg DEX. Sedation was evaluated using the Houpt sedation rating scale. Vital signs were recorded before and during sedation. Prior to sedation, the level of dental fear was determined through children's fear survey schedule-dental subscale (CFSS-DS). Psychological characteristics were screened using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Data were analyzed using T-test, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Overall ratings of sedation and subscales of sleep, crying, and movement were comparable between groups (p> 0.05); however, more acceptable behavior (overall scores (4+5+6) was observed in MDZ group compared to DEX group (64% vs. 47.7%) (p= 0.007). All participants were found to have abnormal levels of dental fear (CFSS-DS≥38). However, according to SDQ, the study participants have mainly shown normal behavioral status. A significant association was found between dental fear and sedation success (MDZ, p= 0.001, DEX, p= 0.03), while similar findings were not observed for psychological characteristics (MDZ, p= 0.09 and p= 0.41; DEX, p= 0.71 and p= 0.53). Physiological parameters remained within normal limits in both groups. Conclusion: Sedation with IN MDZ resulted in overall behaviors, which were more satisfactory in highly fearful pediatric dental patients. Despite baseline uncooperative behaviors, the psychological status of study participants were close to average and were not associated with sedation failure.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Dental fear, Dexmedetomidine, IN sedation, Midazolam

نویسندگان مقاله Katayoun Salem |
Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Azad University Tehran, Iran. Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Guilan Dental school, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Hossein Khoshrang |
Dept. of Anesthesia, Guilan Medical School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Elham Esmaeeli |
Dentist, Guilan Dental School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Mona Vatankhah |
Pediatric Dentist, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Azad University Tehran, Iran.


نشانی اینترنتی https://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/article_48239_638d0fba1918f0345f72d04d052c9315.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات