این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences، جلد ۱۸، شماره ۳، صفحات ۲۴۶-۲۵۹
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Comparison of the Outcomes of Three Detoxification Methods (Clonidin, Methadon, Rapid) in Opioid-dependents Referred to Kerman Shaheed Beheshti Hospital in a 6 -month Follow- up
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Background & Aims: In this study the efficacy of traditional method, methadone tapering method and rapid method as three opiate detoxification treatments was compared based on demographic features and naltrexone consumption in a 6- month follow up. Method: This Cohort prospective study was performed on 140 opioid addict men referred to opiate detoxification center of Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kerman/ Iran from 2005-2007. They were divided into three groups of traditional method (n= 61), methadone tapering (n= 34) and rapid treatment (n= 45) and followed up for 6 months in order to evaluate the results of detoxification treatments. Results:At the end of the first month, the rate of abstinence in whole was 80.7%, and this rate was 83.6% in traditional treatment group, 82.4% in methadone group and 75.6% in rapid treatment group that shows no significant difference. After the 6th month the rate of abstinence was 12.8% in whole, 16.7% in traditional treatment group, 16.7% in methadone group and 6.3% in rapid treatment group. These rates, too, show no significant difference among three groups. The rate of naltrexone consumption at the end of the 1st month was 75.7% in whole, 52.5% in traditional group, 47.1% in methadone group and 97.8% in rapid treatment group that shows significant difference among three groups (P< 0.05). There was no case of naltrexone consumption at the end of the 6th month. Conclusion: Since the rate of relapse and results of three detoxification methods have been the same the best detoxification method for each patient should be selected based on the physical condition of the patient, available facilities, probable expenses and physician's clinical judgment.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله h ziyaodini |
associate professor of psychiatry, neuroscience research center, kerman university of medical sciences, kerman, iran
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان (Kerman university of medical sciences)

n پرورش |
assistant professor of psychiatry, neuroscience research center, kerman university of medical sciences, kerman, iran
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان (Kerman university of medical sciences)

n افشار |
psychiatrist

سید محمد حسینیان | s m
general practitioner

r سرحدی |
general practitioner

علی اکبر hagdost | a a
associate professor of epidemiology, physiology research center amp;amp; school of health, kerman university of medical sciences, kerman, iran
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان (Kerman university of medical sciences)

نشانی اینترنتی http://jkmu.kmu.ac.ir/article_16568_7df47a31c644f150ccf995578dd299dc.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/93/article-93-405062.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات