این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
Iranian Economic Review، جلد ۹، شماره ۱۱، صفحات ۵۷-۶۶
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Rational Choice Theory: A Cultural Reconsideration
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Economists have heralded the formulation of the expected utility theorem as a universal method of choice under uncertainty. In their seminal paper, Stigler and Becker (Stigler & Becker, 1977) declared that “human behavior can be explained by a generalized calculus of utility-maximizing behavior” (p.76). The universality of the rational choice theory has been widely criticized by psychologists, political scientists, feminists, philosophers and other social thinkers. Tversky and Kahneman (1986) have shown that the framing of choice problems can influence the decisions. Herber Simon (1959) and James March (1958) have pioneered models of bounded rationality. Paula England (1993) refers to works of some feminist philosophers who believe that the concept of rationality is gender biased. This paper challenges the rational choice decision-making model from a cultural viewpoint. In brief, this article will show that the expected utility theorem, as a decision making model, is compatible with the cultural norms and values that are often found in capitalist societies from which they come, Consequently, the absence of certain cultural values in non-capitalistic societies will yield alternative decision models.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
نشانی اینترنتی http://ier.ut.ac.ir/article_30911_b73e4f1f8654d18b1022513b3e2d2e13.pdf
فایل مقاله اشکال در دسترسی به فایل - ./files/site1/rds_journals/434/article-434-386022.pdf
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات