این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
آب و خاک، جلد ۳۰، شماره ۲، صفحات ۴۰۵-۰
عنوان فارسی برآورد عدم قطعیت منحنی سنجه رسوب با استفاده از دو روش گلو و خودگردان‌ساز
چکیده فارسی مقاله به منظور مدیریت حوضه جهت کاهش اثرات فرسایش خاک نیاز است تا میزان رسوب معلق خروجی حوضه برآورد گردد. بدین منظور روش منحنی سنجه متداول‌‌‌ترین روش آماری برای برآورد رسوب معلق در زمانی که داده‌های رسوب معلق برداشت نشده است می باشد. با توجه به خطاهای داده‌‌‌‌های برداشتی و محدود بودن این داده‌ها مقدار رسوب برآوردی با استفاده از روش منحنی سنجه دارای عدم قطعیت هایی است. بدین منظور در این تحقیق با استفاده از روش های گلو و خودگردان‌ساز اقدام به برآورد عدم قطعیت روش منحنی سنجه در چهار ایستگاه حوضه قزل اوزن گردید. در ایستگاه موتور خانه و میانه تول شماره 7 تابع سیگموئید در ایستگاه استور تابع چند جمله ای مرتبه دوم و در ایستگاه گلینک تابع خطی بهترین برازش را به داده‌های مشاهداتی داشتند. نتایج برآورد عدم قطعیت نشان داد که دامنه عدم قطعیت حاصل از روش خودگردان‌ساز نسبت به روش گلو بزرگتر بود و تعداد بیشتری داده‌های مشاهداتی را در بر گرفت. همچنین میزان عدم قطعیت برآورد رسوب با استفاده از روش منحنی سنجه تابعی از تراکم داده‌های برداشتی و نوع تابع مورد استفاده بود. نتایج آنالیز حساسیت روش گلو نشان داد با کاهش مقدار آستانه دامنه عدم قطعیت بیشتر می شود اما همچنان دامنه عدم قطعیت بدست آمده کمتر از دامنه عدم قطعیت بدست آمده با استفاده از روش خودگردان‌ساز بود.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی Sediment Curve Uncertainty Estimation Using GLUE and Bootstrap Methods
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Introduction: In order to implement watershed practices to decrease soil erosion effects it needs to estimate output sediment of watershed. Sediment rating curve is used as the most conventional tool to estimate sediment. Regarding to sampling errors and short data, there are some uncertainties in estimating sediment using sediment curve. In this research, bootstrap and the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) resampling techniques were used to calculate suspended sediment loads by using sediment rating curves. Materials and Methods: The total drainage area of the Sefidrood watershed is about 560000 km2. In this study uncertainty in suspended sediment rating curves was estimated in four stations including Motorkhane, Miyane Tonel Shomare 7, Stor and Glinak constructed on Ayghdamosh, Ghrangho, GHezelOzan and Shahrod rivers, respectively. Data were randomly divided into a training data set (80 percent) and a test set (20 percent) by Latin hypercube random sampling.Different suspended sediment rating curves equations were fitted to log-transformed values of sediment concentration and discharge and the best fit models were selected based on the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and the highest correlation of coefficient (R2). In the GLUE methodology, different parameter sets were sampled randomly from priori probability distribution. For each station using sampled parameter sets and selected suspended sediment rating curves equation suspended sediment concentration values were estimated several times (100000 to 400000 times). With respect to likelihood function and certain subjective threshold, parameter sets were divided into behavioral and non-behavioral parameter sets. Finally using behavioral parameter sets the 95% confidence intervals for suspended sediment concentration due to parameter uncertainty were estimated. In bootstrap methodology observed suspended sediment and discharge vectors were resampled with replacement B (set to 3000) times. Sediment rating curves equation was fitted to each sampled suspended sediment and discharge data sets. Using these sediment rating curve and their residual suspended sediment concentration were calculate for test data. Finally using the 2.5 and 97.5 percentile of the B bootstrap realizations, 95% bootstrap prediction intervals were predicted. Results and Discussion: Results showed that Motorkhane and MiyaneTonelShomare 7 stations were best fitted by a sigmoid function and Stor and Glinak stations were best fitted by second order polynomial and liner function, respectively The first 50 of the B bootstrapped curves were plotted for all stations.with respect to these plots implied that bootstrapped curves more scattered whereas observed data were less. The suspended sediment curve parameters estimated more accurately where, the suspended sediments were sampled more, as a result of reduced uncertainty in estimated suspended sediment concentration due to parameter uncertainty. In addition to sampling density bootstrapped curves, uncertainty depends on the curve shape. For GLUE methodology to assess the impact of threshold values on the uncertainty results, threshold values systematically changed from 0.1 to 0.45. Study results showed that 95% confidence intervals are sensitive to the selected threshold values and higher threshold values will result in an increasing 95% confidence interval. However, the highest 95% confidence intervals obtained by GLUE method (when threshold value was set to 0.1) was little than those values obtained by Bootstrap. Conclusions: The uncertainty of sediment rating curves was addressed in this study by considering two different procedures based on the GLUE and bootstrap methods for four stations in Sefidrod watershed.Results showed that nonlinear equation fitted log-transformed values of sediment concentration and discharge better than linear equation. Uncertainty result using GLUE depend on chosen threshold values. As threshold values increased, 95% confidence intervals decreased. Uncertainty results showed that 95% confidence intervals estimated by bootstrap were higher than the biggest 95% confidence intervals (when threshold value set to 0.1) estimated by GLUE method. Overall, in all stations, 95% confidence intervals arising from suspended sediment curve shapes (e.g, linear, second order polynomial and sigmoid function), data sampling density and uncertainty estimation methods (here were GLUE and Bootstrap).
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله ابوالحسن فتح آبادی |


حامد روحانی |


نشانی اینترنتی http://jsw.um.ac.ir/index.php/jsw/article/view/39843
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده علمی - پژوهشی
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات