این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
صفحه اصلی
درباره پایگاه
فهرست سامانه ها
الزامات سامانه ها
فهرست سازمانی
تماس با ما
JCR 2016
جستجوی مقالات
جمعه 28 شهریور 1404
Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
، جلد ۱۴، شماره ۳، صفحات ۹۶-۰
عنوان فارسی
چکیده فارسی مقاله
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy between Open-Tray and Closed-Tray Implant Impression Technique in 15° Angled Implants
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Statement of Problem: Various impression techniques have different effects on the accuracy of final cast dimensions. Meanwhile; there are some controversies about the best technique. Purpose: This study was performed to compare two kinds of implant impression methods (open tray and closed tray) on 15 degree angled implants. Materials and Method: In this experimental study, a steel model with 8 cm in diameter and 3 cm in height were produced with 3 holes devised inside to stabilize 3 implants. The central implant was straight and the other two implants were 15° angled. The two angled implants had 5 cm distance from each other and 3.5 cm from the central implant. Dental stone, high strength (type IV) was used for the main casts. Impression trays were filled with poly ether, and then the two impression techniques (open tray and closed tray) were compared. To evaluate positions of the implants, each cast was analyzed by CMM device in 3 dimensions (x,y,z). Differences in the measurements obtained from final casts and laboratory model were analyzed using t-Test. Results: The obtained results indicated that closed tray impression technique was significantly different in dimensional accuracy when compared with open tray method. Dimensional changes were 129 ± 37μ and 143.5 ± 43.67μ in closed tray and open tray, while coefficient of variation in closed- tray and open tray were reported to be 27.2% and 30.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Closed impression technique had less dimensional changes in comparison with open tray method, so this study suggests that closed tray impression technique is more accurate.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
نویسندگان مقاله
f بلوچ | f balouch
dept. of prosthodontics, dental branch, islamic azad university, tehran, iran.
سازمان اصلی تایید شده
: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی علوم و تحقیقات (Islamic azad university science and research branch)
e جلالیان | e jalalian
dept. of prosthodontics, dental branch, islamic azad university, tehran, iran.
سازمان اصلی تایید شده
: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی علوم و تحقیقات (Islamic azad university science and research branch)
m نیک خصلت | m nikkheslat
dds
r قوامیان | r ghavamian
dds
sh توپچی | sh toopchi
dental student, dental branch, islamic azad university. tehran, iran.
سازمان اصلی تایید شده
: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی علوم و تحقیقات (Islamic azad university science and research branch)
f جلالیان | f jalalian
post graduate student, dept. of radiology, dental faculty, isfahan university of medical sciences, isfahan, iran.
سازمان اصلی تایید شده
: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان (Isfahan university of medical sciences)
s جلالیان | s jalalian
post graduate student, dept. of prosthodontics, dental branch, islamic azad university, tehran, iran.
سازمان اصلی تایید شده
: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی علوم و تحقیقات (Islamic azad university science and research branch)
نشانی اینترنتی
http://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/index.php/JDSUMS/article/view/2
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
en
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
Original Article
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه
|
نسخه مرتبط
|
نشریه مرتبط
|
فهرست نشریات