این سایت در حال حاضر پشتیبانی نمی شود و امکان دارد داده های نشریات بروز نباشند
پژوهش های فلسفی – کلامی، جلد ۲۷، شماره ۱، صفحات ۵-۲۰
عنوان فارسی An Intersubjective Approach in the Validation of Axioms Considering Islamic Philosophy
چکیده فارسی مقاله Axioms are crucial to epistemic frameworks, as several schools of the history of science have recognized. The issue of the current research is that in the validation of axioms, what defects does the intuitive approach entail, and how can the intersubjective approach (based on the ideas of Islamic philosophers) be explained as an alternative, less-known system? The former is dedicated to clarifying and criticizing what is called the intuitive approach to validating axioms: this approach is attributed to classical philosophers and consists of assuming that axioms are propositions whose truth is immediately evident upon taking into account the terms they are based on. The latter focuses on clarifying the alternative approach, called the intersubjective approach of validating axioms (IAVA): this approach is attributed to a specific Islamic tradition, developed by Avicenna and Mullā Ṣadrā, and consists of assuming that axioms are propositions that cannot be rationally proved, denied, or doubted, without being already assumed. In this article, we present the intersubjective approach from a historical point of view.
کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله
عنوان انگلیسی An Intersubjective Approach in the Validation of Axioms Considering Islamic Philosophy
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله Axioms are crucial to epistemic frameworks, as several schools of the history of science have recognized. The issue of the current research is that in the validation of axioms, what defects does the intuitive approach entail, and how can the intersubjective approach (based on the ideas of Islamic philosophers) be explained as an alternative, less-known system? The former is dedicated to clarifying and criticizing what is called the intuitive approach to validating axioms: this approach is attributed to classical philosophers and consists of assuming that axioms are propositions whose truth is immediately evident upon taking into account the terms they are based on. The latter focuses on clarifying the alternative approach, called the intersubjective approach of validating axioms (IAVA): this approach is attributed to a specific Islamic tradition, developed by Avicenna and Mullā Ṣadrā, and consists of assuming that axioms are propositions that cannot be rationally proved, denied, or doubted, without being already assumed. In this article, we present the intersubjective approach from a historical point of view.
کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله Axioms, intersubjective, Validation, Intuitive, knowledge-by-presence, Mullā Ṣadrā
نویسندگان مقاله Mehran Rezaee |
Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Eisa Mohammadinia |
Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Mahdi Emami Jome |
Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Education of Ahl al-Bayt (AS), University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

نشانی اینترنتی https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_3146_38890ac74f1ab2e2531685af9247465b.pdf
فایل مقاله فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
کد مقاله (doi)
زبان مقاله منتشر شده fa
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
برگشت به: صفحه اول پایگاه   |   نسخه مرتبط   |   نشریه مرتبط   |   فهرست نشریات