| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Objective Empirical evidence on the impact of information asymmetry on the cost of equity capital reveals ongoing inconsistencies in the literature. While some studies report a positive relationship, others find it to be negative or statistically insignificant. A significant factor contributing to this divergence is the role of control variables. Although there exists a wide range of potential control variables, the inclusion of certain variables may distort the results, whereas others can enhance the accuracy of the research findings. This meta-analysis aims to investigate which control variables, based on those repeatedly employed in prior studies, significantly influence the regression coefficient in comparison to their exclusion. Methods The empirical examination of the relationship between information asymmetry and the cost of equity capital revealed notable divergences. To investigate this issue, a meta-analysis approach was employed, highlighting the varying effects of control variables on this relationship. This meta-analysis synthesizes the findings from 35 studies published between 1986 and 2022, encompassing a total of 198 tests, to illuminate the intricate relationship between information asymmetry and the cost of equity capital. The analysis was carried out in multiple stages: information asymmetry was designated as the independent variable, and the cost of equity capital was identified as the dependent variable. Control variables included the book-to-market ratio, market beta, company size, type of ownership, yield fluctuations, equity, leverage, and growth. Comprehensive searches were conducted in prominent databases such as Science Direct, Emerald, Google Scholar, SSRN, and ResearchGate, resulting in the extraction of 188 articles based on pertinent keywords. The articles were screened for alignment with the research hypotheses, focusing on studies that provided effect size information and employed correlation methods. Consequently, 35 studies published between 1986 and 2022, incorporating 198 effect sizes, were selected for meta-analysis. Relevant general information and details about effect sizes were meticulously extracted from the selected articles. For each sample, the effect size, denoted as r, was calculated. Effect sizes were aggregated using weighted means, accounting for sampling error. Finally, the homogeneity of effect sizes was assessed. Results The findings indicate considerable variation in effect sizes across the studies analyzed. Consequently, a random effects model was utilized to calculate the cumulative effect size. Control variables play a crucial role in shaping the relationship between information asymmetry and the cost of equity capital. Specifically, the inclusion of control variables such as the book-to-market ratio, market beta, firm size, and ownership type tends to diminish the strength of this relationship. In contrast, factors such as stock return volatility, leverage, and firm growth do not significantly alter this relationship. A robustness analysis further corroborates these preliminary findings. Conclusion Empirical researchers often face challenges in selecting appropriate control variables when examining the relationship between information asymmetry and the cost of equity capital. This raises a critical question: which control variables should be included to enhance the validity and reliability of the empirical results? This study identifies four key control variables that significantly impact the observed relationship: the book-to-market ratio, market beta, firm size, and ownership type. Incorporating these variables into the regression model substantially alters the outcomes of the analysis. |