|
|
International Journal of Health Policy and Management، جلد ۱۰، شماره ۳، صفحات ۱۶۲-۱۶۴
|
|
|
| عنوان فارسی |
|
|
| چکیده فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| عنوان انگلیسی |
Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States; Comment on “Universal Pharmacare in Canada” |
|
| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Policy decisions about healthcare coverage in Canada and the United States in the 1960s placed two virtually identical systems on different evolutionary paths in the physician and hospital sectors. However, prescription drug coverage remained outside Canada’s single-payer model, and employer-based coverage continued to be the norm for the workforce population, as is the case across the broad healthcare system in the United States. As a result the current debate about pharmacare in Canada mirrors in political microcosm the larger debate on universal health insurance among American Democrats. In each case the near-term prospects for a single-payer plan appear slim. |
|
| کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله |
Healthcare Politics,
Universal Pharmacare,
Medicare for All,
Canada,
United States |
|
| نویسندگان مقاله |
Carolyn Hughes Tuohy |
Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
|
|
| نشانی اینترنتی |
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3771_23a83645d91b6b39b483154012b3aee8.pdf |
| فایل مقاله |
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است |
| کد مقاله (doi) |
|
| زبان مقاله منتشر شده |
en |
| موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده |
|
| نوع مقاله منتشر شده |
|
|
|
|
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه |
نسخه مرتبط |
نشریه مرتبط |
فهرست نشریات
|